AP, Climate Wire, etc: More on that crashed CO2 mission …
Wednesday, February 25th, 2009
After a what in Earth observing news early yesterday – the stunning failure of NASA’s Carbon Orbiting Observatory to reach orbit (with several breaking stories gathered two posts down) – by late afternoon and into today we get a packet of needed so what reporting that addresses the crash’s aftermath in the climate science and policy world.
Stories include:
- AP – Seth Borenstein : NASA rocket failure blow to Earth watching network ; It’s all here – the bitter pill for mission workers and the broader context of a lagging US earth observing program. The mission was expected to be the first brick in the space agency’s return to eminence in the field. Borenstein talks with appropriate big shots – former NSF and OSTP director Neal Lane, NASA space science boss Ed Weiler, and several top profs.
- Climate Wire – Lauren Morello : After NASA’s carbon observatory crashes, scientists ask, ‘What’s next?’ ; Climate Wire is not a well-known outlet. The Tracker’s fleeting eye would probably have skipped past it as a special-interest pub. But this link is carried on the NYTimes web site. That’s an endorsement. Glad I stopped. Looks like Ms. Morello was well-prepared, and transformed an expected, heavily-reported celebration story into a lament.
BBC - Mostly an accident report, with some context, and notable for the excellent, explanatory graphic.- Washington Post – Joel Achenbach, Juliet Eilperin : NASA must regroup after satellite loss ; NASA’s Weiler says a re-do is an option, but it is too early to commit to it.
- Chicago Tribune – Frank James (blog) : NASA’s failed satellite carried big hopes ; While overshadowed by Obama’s big speech, he writes, “that was one very important satellite.” Interesting story structure has insets of text lifted (with credit) from another outlet and from a NASA press kit.
- MSNBC – Alan Boyle (Cosmic Log blog): Black day for a greener NASA ; Boyle knits in many strands, including NASA boss Michael Griffin’s early Bush-era musing that climate change may not be a job for NASA, the late Bush-era promise to boost such studies, and the climate-worried remarks by new science adviser John Holdren during Senate confirmation.
- Los Angeles Times – John Johnson Jr. : NASA satellite crashes ; Blow to NASA, to climate science and, it says here, to rocket maker Orbital Sciences Corp. Nice roundup – but in the “not seen gambling recently” category of false reassurance, its final graf on the rocket’s toxic hydrazine fuel might only prompt public worries where none, due to this particular accident’s nature, would have merit.
- Times (UK) – Chris Ayres : Mission to map Earth’s CO2 ends as rocket crashes into H2O ; Good lord, this one puts the peril of hydrazine that could be “poisoning the ocean” in its lede and second graf. This is an error in the category of jamming the there is no such thing as a little bit pregnant square peg into a round hole. Some people have a tendency to equate pollution with sin – it’s wrong and deserving of perdition, period. Releases of radioactive materials trigger such fear most commonly. Some carcinogens in drinking water do too. Dilution is not the cure-all solution for pollution that industry spokespeople might say it is. But it sure helps. How could a whole tank, or ten of them, of hydrazine poison the Southern Ocean? It might wipe out one herd of krill but those things reproduce fast. Reporter Ayres also finds newsworthy that a few conservative bloggers celebrated the dousing of this investigation into perceived, phony science. That, actually, is marginally interesting. Then his hypocrisy detector brings him to note that no carbon footprint analysis of the mission is available. ………say what?!
- Denver Post – Mark Jaffe : Rocket crashes with CSU device to measure CO2 ; A purely local story on the two scientists and their hopes the year after years of work they’d put into this package.
- Orlando Sentinel – Robert Block: $273M mission’s demise disheartens NASA;