website statistics

(Updated*) Lots of Ink: 20 light years away, a fairy tale planet ju-u-u-ust right for life (and good enough for a press frenzy)?

(Note: This is the only post from me today – distraction, and this post’s topic and huge news flow, stole the morning/CP)

See that painting there? Today millions of people have seen it too. Way cool, eh? No wonder they call some exoplanets SuperEarths. It’s what prolific science illustrator-artist Lynette Cook concocted to depict Gliese 581g, a planet of a red dwarf star just 20 light years away. Word of this planet’s existence was greeted yesterday afternoon and this morning by an explosion of news stories. Detonating it was a DC press conference, pre-print on line of an upcoming paper in Astrophysical Journal, video, press releases … a full p.r. drumline. This may be the biggest non-medical, purely gee-whiz  science story to briefly, abruptly captivate media since Ardi the genuine pre-human ancestral relative, maybe even since Ida, the overhyped but distant conceivable but probably not-ancestor. Our roots a long time ago and our possible doppelgangers on a far planet seem to trigger the same fixed gaze of attention.

As for that painting,  Ms. Cook was smart to show the planet basically back lit, with one illuminated limb visible. As the planet keeps one face perennially, tidally locked to its tiny star, we see a stretch along the terminator between a dark, deeply frozen hemisphere and a bright, deeply cooked one. But those and land-o’-lakes dappling of blue water? That’s the thing about artist’s impressions. They’re eye candy to stimulate imagination. They may have only slight connection to the science. That picture, however, may drive the public’s imagination more than any number of paragraphs of text, however well-crafted.

The image may be plausible. Barely. Indulge me here, but one thinks there would be NO liquid water on such a place – it’d all freeze out on the dark side, building an immense ice cap stiff as granite under the endless night. Maybe outlet glaciers could get enough heat from sun-side-spawned windstorms to crawl into the light, melt, sublimate, make clouds and rain and seas and generate a weird hydrological cycle? Again maybe. Pure guess: fat chance.

The news is that Gliese 487a star’s planetary system, which has been studied for 11 years and often to great publicity before, has now yielded Doppler-shift data implying the best planet yet (see Earlier Post for news on previous ones, with another artist’s impression). This one seems to be in the Goldilocks zone where temperatures, on average, should permit liquid water on any solid planet. The inferred new one is small, not much bigger in diameter than Earth, and about three times as massive (don’t forget – spherical mass goes as the cube of radius). But its existence is reason to think scads of other stars may have habitable zones occupied by Earthlike planets. One  might some day, if we get far better telescopes to look closely, vindicate that painting up there.

There is a quote issue to discuss. The paper’s lead author (among six),  UC Santa Cruz’s Steve Vogt, enthused at the teleconference that he, personally, is 100 percent confident there is life on this planet. Okay. That’s his guess and vigorously phrased, as you’ll see reading accounts. But such things demand careful treatment. A scientist-says statement, if not further addressed,  implies that it reflects what is in the formal report too. A reporter should ask, “Really? Would you publish those odds in a refereed paper?” Back would surely come an answer along the lines of: C’mon, are you kidding? No!

But alas, several reporters did not couch the remark as the giddy small talk it was. One exception is at the NYTimes, where Dennis Overbye uses the quote and immediately follows up by getting the response from a co-author that he prefers data. Ergo, no way is it 100 percent sure. Overbye thus has it both ways in a good sense of the term – the quote for impact, and the context to assure readers how it was framed, and not to take it too literally.

*UPDATE 1: One learns from participants that the audio call-in for questions during the teleconference was spotty, so most had to email questions. Many did follow up the 100% remark for clarification and got some satisfaction – but the give-and-take of a traditional press conference was absent.

*UPDATE 2: At Universe Today, Nancy Atkinson has two stories. The first lays out the news, apparently largely from the UCSC press release, with attribution. More interesting is a second, more analytical piece focussed largely on that “100 percent” line from Vogt. which she calls the spark for “wild speculation” on the meaning of these findings. She’s careful and smart, and quotes to good effect some of the twitter twaffic (@Gliese581_G) on the statement and what it meant and on its impact.

Other Stories:

Grist for the Mill:

UC Santa Cruz Press Release ; U. Hawaii Inst. for Astronomy Press Release ; NASA Press Release ; Carnegie Institution for Science Press Release ; National Science Foundation Press Release with related video, pics.

Apj Paper (via arXiv.org)

- Charlie Petit

2 Responses to “(Updated*) Lots of Ink: 20 light years away, a fairy tale planet ju-u-u-ust right for life (and good enough for a press frenzy)?”

  1. music blog Says:

    Yes, I am sure that when the time will come, that our planet will fall a part, we will allready find other planets to live on.


  2. gooper Says:

    Yes, we probably will, but you gotto know, 20 LIGHT YEARS AWAY is wery far far far away! And if the sun expands in 2013 like I read today, we are preaty much scr*ved :)


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.