website statistics

Lots of Ink: A whisp of anti-hydrogen, caught in a magnet’s gentle squeeze

(Note – This is posted a day later than planned after mid-composition delay to replace a modem.)

Boosted by hot press releases from institutions taking part in the int’l effort and publication in the esteemed journal Nature, some news outlets are attaching tremendous excitement to word from an international consortium that it not only generated some supercold hydrogen analogs made of antiparticles, but held them prisoner. Briefly. That came in a specially crafted octupolar magnetic field that nudges them into a crowd by taking advantage of the slight polarity in atoms that, overall, have no electric charge.

To read some of the stories you’d think they were shaking the very foundations of physics – rewriting the laws of the universe – opening a new window into creation – glimpsing the infinite – or (you plug in your own hyper-cliche).

It is diverting enough. An anti-proton with a positron in its thrall? That’s neat. But, while coolly levitating in a photonic grail of inward-nudging EM gradients, until it does something  that defies or extends known physics it’s not, one may suspect, quite the breathless new venture into mystery that some accounts suggest. But it is an impressive technical feat and likely prelude to new science. It is a story simply because antimatter has an otherworldly, semi-mythical sci-fi aura to it no matter what the specific news. Ergo, a sure fire lure to the imaginations and eyeballs of many readers.

And finally, straight to Star Trek…

Grist for the Mill:

CERN Press Release ; UCBerkeley Press Release ; Lawrence Berkeley Nat’l Lab Press Release ; U. of Liverpool Press Release ; University of Calgary Press Release ;

- Charlie Petit

2 Responses to “Lots of Ink: A whisp of anti-hydrogen, caught in a magnet’s gentle squeeze”

  1. Michelangelo D'Agostino Says:

    Is the lack of comment on the Economist article a good thing or a bad thing? :)


  2. Charlie Petit Says:

    It’s a no thing. If I read a piece that is sort of in the middle – and The Economist did its usual fine erudite job – or does not jump out at me, I move on. No sense typing something just to fill space. Thanks for asking.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.