website statistics

Scattered Ink: Review clears US researchers of misdeeds in climate research (Think e-mails)

Did anybody run this front page?  In the NY Times, under Leslie Kaufman‘s byline and the single column hed Scientists Are Cleared Of Misuse of Data, it was on p. A18. So dies ClimateGate (in a perfect world). The news, which reinforces similar conclusions reached by investigators in ClimateGate Central, the UK, is that for all their snark about climate contrarians the scientists whose e-mails touched it off did not distort, hide, or deliberately analyze incorrectly the data they’d gathered on the world’s climate, weather, or much of anything else – except for being  impolite behind their backs to people who had been hooting about their work.

The news is that after Senator James Inhofe requested that the Inspector General of the Natinal Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration investigate whether any of its affiliated scientists whose e-mails were among the purloined missives had fooled around with data or otherwise committed misleading or fraudulent scientists, the IG found no such thing.

Other stories:

Grist for the Mill:

NOAA Press Release ; NOAA IG  report ; Sen. James Inhofe office Press Release ;

- Charlie Petit

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.